![]() Rather, through complex mechanisms of authority signal and the political inertia induced by those decisions, almost all of the Court's decisions have achieved substantial, albeit imperfect, compliance. US, one finds that the manner in which the ICJ was seised of jurisdiction is actually a poor predictor of subsequent compliance. By analysing the ICJ's final decisions since the landmark case of Nicaragua v. This article takes issue with that assessment. ![]() Anything less than a clear indication of consent by the defendant state in a given case is thought to run serious non-compliance risks. Scholars have long blamed this on the ICJ's ‘flawed’ jurisdictional architecture, which is based entirely on consent. Its malcontents criticize the Court as an ineffective player in achieving international peace and security, largely because of its perceived inability to control state behaviour. One striking example is the International Court of Justice. International institutions are plagued by too many expectations and too little power.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |